Compare AI models: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Qwen3.7 PlusAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Plus | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 54/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 17/100 | 92/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.32/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$1.28/ 1M
$10/ 1M
Cached input
$0.06/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
116K
32K
Completed sessions
1,219,233
86,691
Token share
0.05%
0.02%
Tokens
673B-61%
191B+100%
SEP 6OCT 31
SEP 6OCT 31
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
62.4%6.9K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeQwen3.7 Plus vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.7 Plus·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeKimi K3.1 Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K3.1 Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonQwen3.7 Plus vs Jamba MiniQwen3.7 Plus·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonKimi K3.1 Pro vs Jamba MiniKimi K3.1 Pro·Jamba Mini