GitHub[220K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-op vs MiMo-V2.5

  1. deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-opDeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-op50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder
MiMo-V2.517/10053/10047/10092/10067/10050/100
Overview
Author
Context length
Unknown
1M
Reasoning
Unknown
True
Input modalities
Unknown
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Unknown
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
Unknown
$0.40/ 1M
Output
Unknown
$2.00/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.08/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
8.1K
781K
Completed sessions
72,415
33,805,574
Token share
0.02%
1.83%
Tokens
289B+100%
23T-47%
SEP 6OCT 31
SEP 6OCT 31
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
66.9%18K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.