Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	56/100	100/100	68/100	81/100	33/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	68/100	81/100	50/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

Context length

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image

Text, Image, Video

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Pricing

Input

$0.15/ 1M

Output

$0.60/ 1M

Cached input

$0.003/ 1M

$0.01/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

65K

943K

Completed sessions

907,606

125,615,275

Token share

0.22%

15.3%

Tokens

2.7T+100%

188T+100%

SEP 6OCT 31

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

Pending

75.4%11K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.