Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- GLM-5.3-FlashZhipu
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | 56/100 | 100/100 | 68/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| GLM-5.3-Flash | 56/100 | 35/100 | 73/100 | 81/100 | 67/100 | 0/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.12/ 1M
Output
$0.60/ 1M
$0.42/ 1M
Cached input
$0.003/ 1M
$0.03/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
65K
1.1M
Completed sessions
907,606
16,861,912
Token share
0.22%
2.83%
Tokens
2.7T+100%
35T-30%
SEP 6OCT 31
SEP 6OCT 31
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
62.5%83K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGLM-5.3-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5.3-Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGLM-5.3-Flash vs Jamba MiniGLM-5.3-Flash·Jamba Mini