CompareAI models
- DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
- Hy3Tencent
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 100/100 | 87/100 | 37/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | 44/100 |
| Hy3 | 100/100 | 69/100 | 75/100 | 54/100 | 0/100 | No data |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
256K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.60/ 1M
$0.14/ 1M
Output
$3.20/ 1M
$0.58/ 1M
Cached input
$0.14/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.5M
334K
Completed sessions
3,045,881
5,795,195
Token share
6.66%
1.47%
Tokens
31T+27%
6.8T+100%
JUL 8SEP 1
JUL 8SEP 1
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
65.2%137K user-weeks
69.1%1.5K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITDeepSeek V4 Pro·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITNearby alternativeHy3 vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITHy3·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextDeepSeek V4 Pro·Qwen3.8 Flash NextRelated comparisonHy3 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextHy3·Qwen3.8 Flash Next