Compare AI models: LongCat-2.5-Preview vs GLM-5.2
- LongCat-2.5-PreviewMeituanHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- GLM-5.2Zhipu
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LongCat-2.5-Preview | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 37/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| GLM-5.2 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 30/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 88/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.75/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Output
$2.95/ 1M
$4.18/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
291K
139K
Completed sessions
15,849,760
648,358
Token share
0.73%
0.05%
Tokens
9T+100%
642B-87%
SEP 6OCT 31
SEP 6OCT 31
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
62.6%2.8K user-weeks
52.3%13K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeLongCat-2.5-Preview vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructLongCat-2.5-Preview·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGLM-5.2 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5.2·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonLongCat-2.5-Preview vs Jamba MiniLongCat-2.5-Preview·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGLM-5.2 vs Jamba MiniGLM-5.2·Jamba Mini