Compare AI models: MiniMax-M2.7 vs Kimi K2.6

MiniMax-M2.7MiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
Kimi K2.6MoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
MiniMax-M2.7	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	76/100	56/100	50/100	0/100	0/100
Kimi K2.6	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	78/100	35/100	63/100	50/100	27/100

Overview

Author

MiniMax

Moonshot

Context length

205K

262K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text

Text, Image, Video

Output modalities

Text

Providers

MiniMax

Moonshot

Pricing

Input

$0.30/ 1M

$0.80/ 1M

Output

$1.20/ 1M

$3.40/ 1M

Cached input

$0.06/ 1M

$0.16/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

37K

63K

Completed sessions

138,827

223,759

Token share

0.01%

Tokens

119B-63%

103B-83%

SEP 6OCT 31

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

59.8%1.7K user-weeks

56.6%2.7K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M2.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M2.7Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeKimi K2.6 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K2.6Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonMiniMax-M2.7 vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M2.7Jamba Mini Related comparisonKimi K2.6 vs Jamba MiniKimi K2.6Jamba Mini