CompareAI models
- MiniMax-M2.7MiniMax
- Hy4 previewTencent
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax-M2.7 | 100/100 | 77/100 | 61/100 | 49/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| Hy4 preview | 100/100 | No data | 45/100 | 88/100 | 0/100 | No data |
Overview
Author
Context length
205K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.83/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$2.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.06/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
102K
7.6K
Completed sessions
173,159
10,286
Token share
0.07%
0.02%
Tokens
335B-60%
88B+100%
JUL 8SEP 1
JUL 8SEP 1
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
68.8%3.6K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M2.7 vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITMiniMax-M2.7·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITNearby alternativeHy4 preview vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITHy4 preview·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITRelated comparisonMiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextMiniMax-M2.7·Qwen3.8 Flash NextRelated comparisonHy4 preview vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextHy4 preview·Qwen3.8 Flash Next